Free practice exam · no signup needed

Colorado Public Adjuster Practice Exam

20 exam-style questions drawn from the same bank as our full Colorado Public Adjuster course (Colorado Public Adjuster — Exam Prep). Answer all 20, then grade yourself — most state exams require 70% to pass. Explanations for every question are part of the full course.

1. A file holds dozens of close up photographs of damaged surfaces and no wider views. The defect is that:
Digital images have to be printed and dated before they can be consideredPhotographs cannot show extent, which requires measurements taken insteadClose up images carry no weight without the photographer's signed statementWithout overview and mid range context the images do not establish location
2. At notice a client can describe only a ceiling stain, and the cause is not yet known. The best reporting practice is to:
Hold the notice until an inspection establishes the actual cause of the damageReport the observed damage and state that cause and extent are undeterminedReport only the stain, and amend the cause once the inspection is finishedReport the cause as wind driven rain so the file opens on a covered peril
3. Concealment differs from an innocent misrepresentation because concealment requires that the applicant:
Knew the undisclosed fact and knew it was material, yet failed to disclose itPut the false statement in writing on the signed applicationCaused the insurer an actual monetary loss before the policy issuedRepeat the omission across more than one policy term
4. An insurer inspects, requests documents, and advances a mitigation payment while knowing notice was late, and it sends no reservation. It has most likely:
Created a nonwaiver agreement through the insured's acceptance of paymentPreserved the late notice defense by making the advance payment conditionalCommitted an unfair claim practice by paying a claim it may later denyWaived the late notice defense by handling the claim with knowledge of it
5. A public adjuster who worked the claim under a contingent fee is asked to serve as the insured's appraiser. The concern the profession raises is that:
The impartiality requirement may be challenged, which can undo the awardThe insurer would gain a right to withdraw its demand for appraisalThe umpire would then be appointed by a court rather than the appraisersAn appraiser must hold a separate license in the property's jurisdiction
6. Why should a notice of loss describe the damage broadly rather than naming only the one visible item?
Because the form requires the insured to state a dollar amount at noticeBecause a narrowly described notice can be read to exclude damage found laterBecause notice delivered to an agent is never treated as notice to the insurerBecause the insurer must open a separate claim for each item described
7. Thieves steal four rings collectively worth $6,000 from an HO-3 insured. With a typical ISO jewelry-theft sub-limit of $1,500, how does Coverage C respond?
It pays the full $6,000 because the rings are ordinary contentsIt pays nothing because jewelry is excluded propertyIt pays $1,500 per ring, up to $6,000It pays $1,500 total, because theft sub-limits are per-category aggregates
8. Which statement correctly distinguishes an examination under oath from a recorded statement?
The examination is litigation discovery; the statement is a policy conditionThe examination is a policy condition taken under oath; the statement is neitherThe examination requires consent to recording; the statement requires an oathThe examination is informal and taken by telephone; the statement is transcribed
9. Which statement correctly distinguishes salvage from abandonment?
Both allow the insured to force damaged property on the insurerSalvage is the insurer taking property it has paid for; abandonment is barredSalvage is barred by the policy, while abandonment is an insurer rightAbandonment lets the insurer take property it paid for; salvage does not
10. Under BACF Section III, "specified causes of loss" coverage differs from comprehensive in that it:
Covers only a named list of perils — fire, theft, hail, flood, vandalism, and sinking or collision of a conveyance transporting the auto — at a lower costCovers only collision and overturn of the covered auto, paying nothing for fire, theft, hail, flood, or any of the other non-collision perilsDuplicates the comprehensive open-peril grant but adds mechanical breakdown and normal wear, which the physical damage form otherwise excludesCovers any direct and accidental cause of loss except collision or overturn, functioning as the open-peril comprehensive option written on the form
11. How does the construction of an exclusion differ from the construction of an exception to that exclusion?
Ambiguous exclusions are construed strictly against the insurer, while exceptions that restore coverage are construed broadly in favor of the insuredExclusions are construed broadly in favor of the insured, while exceptions that restore coverage are construed against the insuredBoth the exclusion and the exception are construed broadly in favor of the insurer as the party bearing the coverage riskBoth the exclusion and the exception are construed narrowly and strictly against the insured who is seeking coverage
12. A dwelling form insures "against risk of direct physical loss" to the described property, subject only to exclusions. This grant of coverage is:
Named-peril coverageClaims-made coverageExcess coverageOpen-peril (all-risk) coverage
13. An insured refuses a properly demanded examination under oath because he finds it intrusive. The usual consequence is:
A material breach of a policy condition that can defeat the claim entirelyA reduction of the claim by the insurer's cost of the aborted proceedingNone, because the examination is discovery available only inside a lawsuitA delay in payment while the insurer investigates by some other route
14. When a specific provision and a general provision in the same policy conflict, the structural priority rule provides that:
The general provision controls because it applies more broadlyThe specific provision controls over the general provisionThe two provisions cancel each other out, voiding bothThe provision printed earlier in the form controls
15. On an open-peril dwelling form, the carrier denies a claim stating only "cause unknown, therefore not covered." Why is this denial improper?
Carriers may never deny any claim at all without first demanding and completing a full examination under oath of the insured about the cause of the lossOnce the insured shows direct physical loss, the burden shifts to the carrier to prove an applicable exclusion — "cause unknown" does not carry that burdenThe denial is proper — even on open-peril coverage the insured always bears the burden of proving the exact cause of the lossOpen-peril forms by definition contain no exclusions at all, so every direct physical loss to the property must be paid in full
16. A 5-year-old covered appliance originally cost $1,200; its replacement cost at the time of loss is $1,400, and depreciation is 40%. What is the ACV?
$720$480$1,200$840
17. Pre loss listing photographs, receipts, and maintenance records are used principally to:
Substitute for the physical proof of cause and origin at the loss siteShow the property existed in the condition claimed and to date the damageSatisfy the insured's duty to submit to an examination under oathEstablish that the insurer failed to investigate the claim promptly
18. A policy denies coverage for any loss the insured causes by neglecting to protect covered property from further damage after a loss. This is an example of which exclusion type?
Property-based — an entire category of property is carved outDefinition-based — a key defined term is narrowed by the policyConduct-based — a loss caused by specified conduct is carved outCause-based — a specific natural peril is carved out of coverage
19. A DP-1 carries both the Extended Coverage (EC) and Vandalism and Malicious Mischief (V&MM) options. Which peril is still NOT covered?
HailVolcanic eruptionRiot or civil commotionTheft
20. In coastal states, a wind/hail pool that covers the wind peril for properties the voluntary market will not write is an example of a:
A single-parent captive insurer entityA federal multi-peril crop programA non-admitted surplus lines placementWindstorm or beach plan (a residual market)

Want a different set? Refresh the page for 20 new questions — the full course has 500+, each with a complete explanation, plus full-length timed exam simulations and an AI tutor.